Wednesday, January 6, 2010

Do We Need Another 1000 Years?

It is the year 2010—a time of earth people astuteness, if not affluence. If we should hold that the Earth is about 6.5 thousand years old: is it not long enough for us to determine that the legacy of socio-political, philosophical, religious and economic thinkers have failed up? There is no Cosmos on earth! Do we need another 1,000 years to realize the expediency in seeking the Divine Philosophy of the Kosmos?

Rachael Wild wrote: 6.5 thousand years old?What about the dinosaurs n ?ha haxoxox I believe we each have our own internal cosmos,and should only look within to find our own truth,and create our lives upon this truth and thereby create the earth cosmos,so as to speak.To me the divine philosophy of the cosmos means simply that we are all connected universally to every other being,planet,sun,moon,etc in the cosmos and each influences the other and grows in an ever extending continuous flow of amazing trasition,and yes i also believe this transition/lack of transition is often governed by laws,be they karmic or otherwise.If i continue here,i will be here all night and its now 3.33am.Wow!!3.33am.Hello David Wilcock!!,ha ha xoxxxoxox If you wish to discuss this further,or if ive missed your point in any way(i.e.brain gets a bit gaga by 3.33am)then pls send me an inbox message n i ll reply tomorrow.Or reply here if you wish.Many thanks for the post by the way...like a good debate!!he he xoxoxox


I said if ... I did not say it was ... Just like "in the beginning" should really read " in a beginning" in spite of the of the fact that I might have been conservative in my estimation the question still remains do we need another 1000 years to determine that we do not have faculty to save ourselves from ourselves? Further, does believing something make is right or wrong? We generally believe that the sky is blue is that a fact or an optical illusion? Humans have been debating for thousand of years if Zeno, Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Clement, St Augustine, St Thomas Aquinas -to name a few-- did not give us any workable solution to bring Cosmos (divine order to earth) should we suppose that we can do better by debating here?

Joseph Rising Sun wrote: With Philosophy, come ability to reason out certain logical, mathematical and Emperical World Views. However ever the wisest of thinkers could not find a workable answer to solved our human issues by debates or syllogism. It takes the Most High's infinite Wisdom, Knowledge and understanding to arrive at the Macro solution of our core needs for things to fit the model of the Most High. Man's mind is finite and his reason limited to the material physical world. He cannot think outside his bounds. His thoughts are micro in scope.Therefore, man see his world through delusional lenses. Man did not create himself, he was created by a higher intelligence. This Kosmic intelegence has the answers to our world view and the solution to our issues.

No comments:

Post a Comment